Federal Officials Insists Removal of Gender Identity Issues from Sexual Health Curricula, Multiple Jurisdictions Agree

At least 11 states and a pair of regions have complied with a new demand from the federal government to remove references of transgender issues and the existence of transgender and non-binary individuals from a national sexual health program, officials stated.

The government established a recent cutoff for stripping these mentions, threatening the withdrawal of substantial government funding. Almost every of the agreeing jurisdictions have Republican-controlled lawmaking bodies and predominantly Republican governors.

Legal Challenges and Financial Disputes

An additional sixteen jurisdictions and the nation's capital have initiated legal action challenging the administration's demand, claiming it infringes on legislative power, which created the $75 million sex education program, known as the Personal Responsibility Education Program (Prep).

All states involved in the lawsuit are governed by Democratic state executives.

In a recent judicial ruling, a U.S. judge blocked the HHS agency, which manages Prep, from cutting funding to the suing jurisdictions if they refuse to comply.

“The agency does not demonstrate that the updated requirements are justified, nor does it offer any reasonable explanation, other than an excuse, for its actions,” stated the judge, a federal jurist in the state. “HHS provides no evidence that it made factual findings or considered the legal goals.”

Program Goals and Federal Review

Prep aims to educate adolescents on positive interactions and how to prevent unplanned parenthood and the transmission of STIs.

In April, the Trump administration demanded all states and territories receiving program money to submit a version of their curriculum to HHS and its agency, the ACF office, for a “medical accuracy review”.

By late summer, the government dispatched notices to 46 states and territories, stating that, during the review, it had found “content in the educational programs that fall outside the purview of the program's legal framework.”

Specifically, the government claimed it had uncovered evidence of “gender-related concepts,” a term often used by conservative factions to describe the notion that identity is a fluid social construct and that trans and non-binary people exist.

Notable Cases of Requested Changes

The government instructed one state to drop a lesson that said: “Young people may identify in ways that differ from their assigned gender.”

It told another state to delete a line from a educational module that read: “People of all sexual orientations and gender identities need to know how to prevent unplanned pregnancy and infections.”

Additionally, sex educators in numerous states could no longer be told to “show tolerance and understanding for all students, irrespective of individual traits, including race, heritage, religion, economic status, sexual orientation or identity,” according to the notices dispatched to jurisdictions.

Government Comments and Jurisdictional Reactions

“Oversight is imminent,” declared Andrew Gradison, interim leader of the Administration for Children and Families, in a announcement. “Government money will not be used to poison the minds of the youth or promote harmful political doctrines.”

Several states and regions confirmed they would eliminate the content or had completed the process. These include Alaska, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Wyoming, as well as the two territories.

Another pair of jurisdictions, the states, reported their educational programs never included the language mentioned in the government's notices.

Effects on Adolescents and Mental Health

Collectively, these jurisdictions are inhabited by over 120k transgender individuals aged 13 to 17, according to projections from a university department.

“If our goal is to help adolescents and give them a safe space, I’m not sure why we are stomping on the most vulnerable youth in the population,” commented Cindi Huss, who leads Rise that provides sex education in Tennessee.

“When the government says that there’s something incorrect about you and the educators aren’t allowed to provide information or they have to out you to your parents – when you know that that’s not safe – that’s horrible for mental health.”

Nearly half of trans and non-binary youth seriously considered suicide in the previous twelve months, based on a recent study from a suicide-prevention group. School support for these adolescents is associated with lower rates of attempted suicide, the organization found.

Previous Actions and Continuing Conflicts

Earlier this year, the Trump administration instructed a state to cut mentions to transgender topics from its Prep curriculum.

When the Democratic-led state declined, the government withdrew its funding, cutting approximately $12m in government money and stopping sex education programs in educational institutions, youth centers and group homes for foster children.

The California health department is challenging the withdrawal. So far, it has been unsuccessful in replace the withdrawn money.

The government has also told instructors who obtain money from two other federal sex education initiatives, the $50m Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE) and the $101m TPPP initiative, that they cannot teach about “gender-related concepts.”

An recent judicial ruling blocked the government from altering one program, while the Monday court order prohibits it from modifying the other program in the Democratic states that sued over the initiative.

The ACF office did not immediately respond to a inquiry.

Wesley Young
Wesley Young

A passionate software engineer and educator with over 10 years of experience in web technologies and coding tutorials.